Do you want to live forever?

by Socrates on November 15, 2009

Spread it!

Humanity has achieved huge progress in life-extending and anti-aging technologies.

Just weeks ago the BBC reported that today half of the babies born in the advanced world are likely to live to 100.

A quick comparative review shows us the following life expectancy change in years:

Cro-Magnon Era: 18 years
Ancient Egypt: 25 years
1400 Europe: 30 years
1800 Europe and USA: 37 years
1900 USA: 48 years
2002 United States: 78 years

The trend is hard to miss: since our Cro-Magnon times we have managed to increase our longevity fivefold and in the last 100 years we have managed to double it. Both of those trends are important to note for they reveal that we are not only living longer but this change is happening at an accelerating pace.

For example, it took tens of thousands of years to simply double the Cro-Magnon longevity from 18 to the 37 years of 18th century Europe. However, it took only 100 years to double longevity from 48 years in 1900 to 78 in 2002 (and notably more in 2009). Thus by extending life expectancy more and more, transhumanists such as Ray Kurzweil, Nick Bostrom and Aubrey de Grey believe that eventually we shall live forever.

But how will future anti-aging technologies impact human evolution?

Can our understanding of neuro-anatomy get to the point where neuro-technologies based on biogenetics, nanotechnology or brain uploading help us transcend biology and become post- or transhuman?

Can technology indeed discover the legendary and ever elusive Holy Grail of immortality?

Some people say that eventually it will.

Others say that it will not and, more importantly, that it should not.

How about you? Do you want to live forever?


  • http://www.statsdaemon.com/ DingoDogg

    Not sure that this is true:), but thanks for a post.
    Thank you
    DingoDogg

  • http://www.statsdaemon.com/ DingoDogg

    Not sure that this is true:), but thanks for a post.
    Thank you
    DingoDogg

  • http://www.singularitysymposium.com/ Socrates

    What exactly are you referring to my friend?

    If I have made a mistake or published inaccurate information I will certainly do my best to fix it — just be more specific please.

    Thank you for your commend!

  • http://www.singularitysymposium.com Socrates

    What exactly are you referring to my friend?

    If I have made a mistake or published inaccurate information I will certainly do my best to fix it — just be more specific please.

    Thank you for your commend!

  • http://www.facebook.com/aronesty Erik Aronesty

    Anyone who says they don’t is probably lying to themselves or just to you. Life is about staying alive. Without the will to live, might as well stop trying.

  • http://www.SingularityWeblog.com/ Socrates

    I agree entirely Erik. Yet funny enough we all hear occasionally how it is death that supposedly gives meaning to life and how supposedly “unnatural” it is to live forever…

  • http://singularityblog.singularitysymposium.com/to-age-or-not-to-age-trailer/ To Age Or Not To Age Trailer

    [...] Do you want to live forever? [...]

  • http://www.SingularityWeblog.com/ Socrates

    Well Woody, that is an interesting question but it seems to me that this will not be your biggest problem if you do live forever. Plus, we are currently using a fraction of our brain power as it is and we can always supplement our brain memory with some extra chip-based memory if we do run out of space to store data…

  • Cymast

    Sure. Self-preservation is hard-wired in my brain- it’s a beneficial evolutionary trait, like avoidance of pain. And I assume self-preservation would be included in my code if I eventually allowed myself to be transformed into an intelligent software program- or whatever template becomes available in a Kurzweil scenario. In a de Grey scenario, I may “keep” my physical body, but trade or transform various parts of it as needed. I would have no reason to erase my self-preservation instinct.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: